News In Focus
     
SAVE AND SHARE Digg Del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine RSS

Hedging Meets ETNs With Launch Of First 130/30 Portfolio
Written by Murray Coleman   
Thursday, 29 May 2008 00:54

 

The market for exchange-traded funds shifted earlier this year into active management. Now, it has moved into hedge-like strategies.

The First Trust Enhanced 130/30 Index (AMEX: JFT) has launched in the form of exchanged-traded notes.

Like its sister ETFs, the new ETN holds a portfolio of stocks. Unlike ETFs, such ETNs are issued and marketed by a large financial institution.

In this case, JPMorgan Chase is working with First Trust Advisors, developer of the ETN's underlying benchmark.

ProShares has a similar type of 130/30 portfolio in registration. But it hasn't come out yet. That means JPMorgan has captured first-mover status among exchange-traded products in the popular hedging strategy.

"We are excited about working together with JPMorgan on this innovative product that provides a convenient way for investors to gain exposure to this 130/30 strategy," said Dan Waldron, First Trust's senior vice president.

The portfolio is a modified equal-weighted total return index designed to offer 130% long and 30% short exposure to selected large-capitalization U.S. publicly traded equity securities.

JFT is expected to charge an annual expense ratio of 0.95% and will be rebalanced quarterly.

Sophisticated Strategies

"It certainly represents a step up in sophistication in terms of the types of products available to individual investors through exchange-traded products," said Roger Nusbaum, chief investment officer at Your Source Financial in Phoenix, Ariz.

The 130/30 type of strategies are largely used by hedge fund managers, although open-end mutual funds in recent years have also started implementing the formula.

In such a leveraged strategy, portfolios take a 130% long position with its assets. At the same time, another 30% is invested in short positions. The idea is to wind up with net 100% long exposure.

But here's the wrinkle. Such 130/30 funds basically achieve that overall allocation by using three different buckets: a long position, a short position and a leveraged-long position.

"The 100% long position is similar to your normal portfolio," Nusbaum said. "With the leveraged-long 30% and the short 30%, you can pair those off against one another to implement more sophisticated strategies."

For example, say JFT had been around for awhile and put its leveraged-long portion into energy stocks. Then, it might've used the other 30% to short financials. Of course, energy has soared in the past 12 months while financials have been hit hard.

In theory at least, such a 130/30 tactic would've given the fund terrific results.

But some challenges could be in store for an ETN trying this sophisticated strategy.

"At big turns in market cycles, some open-end mutual funds in this alternative strategy really have really done poorly," Nusbaum observed.

But he has no concerns that the ETN will have a problem tracking its index. "The issue is that the index uses growth factors and value factors to determine long positions," Nusbaum said.

Growth factors used by JFT are: three-month, six-month and 12-month price appreciation. The other growth factor is one-year sales growth.

The other half of the picture is the selection process for value names added to the ETN's underlying index. Those will be ranked by factors including: book-to-price, cash-flow-to-price and return on assets. Also, aggregate rankings of both the growth and value factors will be included in long positions.



 

Latest comments on this feature

2 Latest comments on this feature.

In the end, the stock/industry selection skill of the manager must overcome the 0.95% fee to just match the passive benchmark. That is a tall order for the hypothetical, unproven, back-tested strategy that will be used in this and all so-called 130/30 "index" funds.

Posted by Rick Ferri, on Thursday, 29 May 2008

If everyone knew energy would go up and financials down, then those sectors would have been bid up accordingly. So you really are entrusting your index fund to active management that, historically, has not done any better than the market as a whole. And for this you pay 95 basis points, a full 88 basis points above Vanguard's. Over the course of ten years, that's about 9%, without even factoring the compounding and the drag induced by churn and bid/ask spreads. Truly, the grass is always greener . . . .

Posted by Richard, on Thursday, 29 May 2008

Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 
 
Be up-to-date


 

Related Features